What psych verbs and other verbs disclose about the role of Semantic Prominence and Thematic Hierarchy in affixal selection
Abstract
This paper analyses the construction of deverbal adjectives in European Portuguese, focusing on the interface between morphology and semantics, specifically on the role of Thematic Hierarchy and Semantic Prominence on affixal selection. Supported by paradigmatic morphology, the paper shows that suffixes that work in macroparadigms of deverbal adjectives establish a relationship with specific semantic features of the lexical-semantic structure of the base verb in order to construct the derivative. The analysis concludes that suffixes are sensitive to thematic hierarchy, which is based on the semantic prominence of features of the verbs’ theta-roles at work in the paradigm. Data from psych verbs is highly relevant to this finding. The paper is dedicated to Professor Ana Maria Brito, who has always been keenly aware that scientific knowledge is not confined to a specific theory.
References
Ackerman, F. & Moore, J. (2013). Proto-properties in argument realization. In: T. H. King & V. Paiva (Eds.). From quirky case to representing space: Papers in honor of Annie Zaenen. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 9-20.
Alsina, A. (1996). The role of argument structure in grammar. Evidence from Romance. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Aronoff, M. (2016). Competition and the lexicon. In: A. Elia, C. Iacobini, & M. Voghera (Eds.). Livelli di Analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia. Atti del XLVII Congresso Internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana. Roma: Bulzoni Editore, 39-52.
Aronoff, M. & Lindsay, M. (2014). Productivity, blocking, and lexicalization. In: R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67-83.
Aronoff, M. & Lindsay, M. (2015). Partial organization in languages: la langue est un système où la plupart se tient. Proceedings of Décembrettes 8. Retrieved April, 27, 2017 from the World Wide Web: (https://linguistics.stonybrook.edu/faculty/mark.aronoff).
Baker, M.C. (1996). On the structural positions of themes and goals. In: J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.). Phrase structure and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 7-34.
Belletti, A. & L. Rizzi. (1988). Psych-verbs and theta-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 6: 291-352.
Bluteau, R. (1712-1728). Vocabulario portuguez e latino. Coimbra: Companhia de Jesu.
Bonami, O. & Strnadová, J. (2019). Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology. 29(2): 167-197.
Booij, G. (1986). Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch “Agent” nouns. Linguistics. 24: 503-517.
Börjars, K., R. & Sadler, L. (2019). Lexical-functional grammar. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bresnan, J. & Kanerva, J. (1989). Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry. 20: 1-50.
Croft, W. (1993). Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. In J. Pustejovsky (Ed.), Semantics and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 55-72.
Dalrymple, M., Lowe. J. J. & Mycock, L. (2019). The Oxford reference guide to lexical functional grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dik, S.C. (1978). Functional grammar. North-Holland: Amsterdam.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language. 67: 547-619.
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In: E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.). Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1-88.
Fillmore, C. (1971). Some problems for case grammar. In: R. J. O’Brien (Ed.), Report of the 22nd Annual Roundtable Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 35-56.
Fillmore, C. (1977). Topics in lexical semantics. In: R. W. Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 76-138.
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: a functional-typological introduction. Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge; Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Her, O.-S. (2013). Lexical mapping theory revisited. In: T. H. King & V. Paiva (Eds.). From quirky case to representing space: Papers in honor of Annie Zaenen. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 47-59.
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Laczkó, T. (2000). Derived nominals, possessors, and lexical mapping theory. In: M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.). Argument realization. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 189-227.
Laczkó, T. (2003). On oblique arguments and adjuncts of Hungarian event nominals. In: M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.) 2003. Nominals: inside and out. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 201-234.
Levin, B. (2019). On Dowty’s `Proto-roles and Argument Selection’. In L. McNally & Z. Szabó (Eds.). A Reader’s Guide to Classic Papers in Formal Semantics. Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved February, 01, 2021 from the World Wide Web: http://web.stanford.edu/~bclevin/dowty19fin.pdf
Levin, B. & Grafmiller, J. (2013). Do you always fear what frightens you? In: T. H. King & V. Paiva (Eds.). From quirky case to representing space: Papers in honor of Annie Zaenen. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 21-32.
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity. At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge; Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieber, R. (2004). Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieber, R. (2006). The category of roots and the roots of categories: what we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology. 16: 247-272.
Lindsay, M. & Aronoff, M. (2013). Natural selection in self-organizing morphological systems. In: F. Montermini, G. Boyé & J. Tseng (Eds.). Morphology in Toulouse: Selected Proceedings of Décembrettes 7. München: Lincom, 133-153.
Mohanan, T. (1994). Argument Structure in Hindi. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Mohanan, K. P. & Mohanan, Tara. (1998). Strong and weak projection: lexical reflexives and reciprocals. In: M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.). The projection of arguments. Lexical and compositional factors. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 165-194.
Rappaport Hovav, M. & Levin, B. (1992). -Er nominals: implications for the theory of argument structure”. In: T. Stowell & E. Wehrli (Eds.). Syntax and the lexicon. San Diego: Academic Press, 27-153.
Rappaport Hovav, M. & Levin, B. (2007). Deconstructing thematic hierarchies. In: A. Zaenen et al. (Eds.). Architectures, rules, and preferences: Variations on themes by Joan W. Bresnan, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 385-402.
Rappaport Hovav, M. et al. (1993). Levels of lexical representation. In: J. Pustejovsky (Ed.). Semantics and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 37-54.
Rio-Torto, G. (2020). Derivação. In: E. P. Raposo et al. (Eds.). Gramática do Português. Vol. III. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 3027-3149.
Rodrigues, A. S. (2008). Formação de substantivos deverbais sufixados em português. München: Lincom.
Rodrigues, A. S. (2014). Causative eventive chains and selection of affixes in Portuguese nominalisations. Lingue e Linguaggio. XIII(1): 159-184.
Rodrigues, A. S. (2016). Adjetivos deverbais. In: G. Rio-Torto et al. (Eds.). Gramática derivacional do português. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra: 261-296.
Rodrigues, A. S. (2019). Niches in derivational morphology: Specialisation of suffixes within the formation of Portuguese deverbal nouns. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto. 14: 125-146.
Rodrigues, A. S. & Rodrigues, P. J. (2018). Cross-paradigms or the interfaces of wordformation patterns: evidence from Portuguese. Lingue e Linguaggio. XVII(2): 273-288.
Speas, M. (1990). Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Van Valin, R. D. (1990). Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language. 66: 221-260.
Vieira, D. (1871-1874). Grande diccionario portuguez ou thesouro da lingoa portugueza. Porto: Editores Ernesto Chardron e Bartholomeu H. de Moraes, 5 vols.
Zaenen, A. (1993). Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. In: J. Pustejovsky (Ed.). Semantics and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 129-161.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
