Notes for an ethnographic, critical, and multimodal analysis: on some discursive genres of presentation and offer
Abstract
The article proposes a methodological framework for analyzing texts and the respective (sub)genres they represent, more or less on a prototypical basis. The framework is based on the confluence of the ethnography of communication with critical discourse analysis, together with the consideration of several issues arising from the multimodal nature of texts. While ethnographic description places the text in its context of production and interpretation, and suggests some of its keys or relevant points, critical analysis makes their interpretation possible — in social interaction — without forgetting the power relations and ideologies which underlie the processes involved in producing and understanding oral or written discourse. The need for a multimodal component analysis is evident from the nature of the texts themselves and from the impossibility of analyzing them as purely or strictly verbal products. In this study the basic examples used are, on the one hand, cards which serve as prototypical presentation of seers and shamans (distributed in public), and on the other, examples of junk mail advertising electronic and computer appliances. In many ways these sets of cases represent the two extremes of a symbolic multimodal discourse: the use of the most modest resources (monochrome, crude, with very poor graphic capabilities and no images) versus the more baroque resources (polychrome, focusing on images, offering a range of resources, and much more elaborate); at the same time, a highly personalized reference (focusing on the supernatural abilities of an individual) against another very depersonalized one (focusing on objects and prices).
References
Bauman, Richard & Sherzer, Joel (Eds.). 1974. Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2a. ed., 1989).
Birch, David. 1998. Stylistics. In: Jacob L. Mey (Ed.). Concyse Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 955-961.
Calsamiglia, Helena & Tusón, Amparo. 1999. Las cosas del decir. Manual de análisis del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel (2ª ed., 2007).
Colle, Raymond. 2011. El contenido de los mensajes icónicos. La Laguna: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social. Consulta (12/06/2012) en: http://issuu.com/revistalatinadecomunicacion/docs/raymond
Duranti, Alessandro. 1985. Sociocultural dimensions of discourse. In: Teun A. Van Dijk (Ed.). Handbook of discourse analysis. I. Disciplines of discourse. New York: Academic Press, 193-230.
Duranti, Alesandro. 1988. Ethnography of speaking: toward a linguistics of the praxis. In: Frederick J. Newmeyer (Ed.). The Cambridge Survey. IV. Language: The socio-cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 210-228.
Duranti, Alessandro. 1992. Etnografia del parlare quotidiano. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Longman.Ferrándiz, Francisco. 2011. Etnografías contemporáneas. Anclajes, métodos y claves para el futuro. Barcelona: Anthropos – Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Gumperz, John J. & Hymes, Dell (Eds.). 1972. Directions in sociolinguistics. The ethnography of communication. Oxford: Blackwell (2a. ed., 1986).
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1973. Exploration in the Functions of Language. London: Arnold. (Trad. cast.: Exploraciones sobre las funciones del lenguaje. Barcelona: Médica y Técnica, 1982.).
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1976. Language as Social Semiotics. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold. (Trad. cast.: El lenguaje como semiótica social. La interpretación social del lenguaje y del significado. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1982.).
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold (2nd ed., 1994).
Kress, Gunther & Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
LeVine, Philip & Scollon, Ron (Eds.). 2004. Discourse and technology. Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Lomas, Carlos. 1996. El espectáculo del deseo. Usos y formas de la persuasión publicitaria. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Machin, David & Mayr, Andrea. 2012. How To Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
Martín Rojo, Luisa & Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. “Había un problema y se ha resuelto”. Legitimación de la expulsión de inmigrantes “ilegales” en el discurso parlamentario español. In Luisa Martín Rojo & Rachel Whittaker (Eds.), Poder-decir, o el poder de los discursos. Madrid: Arrecife, 169-234.
Martín Rojo, Luisa & Whittaker, Rachel (Eds.). 1998. Poder-decir o el poder de los discursos. Madrid: Arrecife.
Martínez Lirola, María. 2006. A Systemic Functional Analysis of Two Multimodal Covers. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 19, 249-260. Consultable (12/06/2012) en: http://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/5179/1/RAEI_19_14.pdf
Morris, Charles 1946. Signs, language, and behavior. Oxford Prentice-Hall. (Trad. esp.: Signos, lengua y conducta. Buenos Aires: Losada, 1962.).
Palmer, Gary B. 1996. Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin: The University of Texas Press. (Trad. esp.: Lingüística cultural. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2000).
Payrató, Lluís. 2006. Discurso oral y multimodalidad: aspectos introductorios. Oralia 9, 259-275.
Payrató, Lluís. 2008. Discurso, multimodalidad y plurilingüismo. Interrelaciones, interpretaciones y ejemplos. In: José Luis Blas Arroyo, Manuela Casanova Ávalos, Mónica Velando Casanova & Francisco Javier Vellón Lahoz (Eds.). Discurso y sociedad II. Nuevas contribuciones al estudio de la lengua en un contexto social. Castelló: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, 43-57.
Payrató, Lluís. 2009. Entre la lengua y la cultura: aspectos multimodales de la comunicación. In: Elena De Miguel (Ed.): La pluralidad lingüística: Aportaciones sociales, culturales y formativas. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, 135 – 155.
Saville-Troike, Muriel. 1982. The ethnography of communication. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell (2a. ed., 1989).
Scollon, Ron. 2001. Action and text: toward an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action. In: Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (Eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 139-183.
Van Leeuwen, Teo & Wodak, Ruth. 1999. Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical perspective. Discourse Studies 1, 83-118.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ventola, Eija, Charles, Cassily & Kaltenbacher, Martin (Eds.). 2004. Perspectives on multimodality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Michael. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Linguística Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.