Polish as a foreign language at elementary level of instruction: crosslinguistic influences in writing

Authors

  • Danuta Gabrys-Barker University of Silesia

Abstract

Being a minority European language, Polish has not attracted the attention of second language research (SLA) very much. Most studies in the area focus on English and other major languages describing variables and process observed in learners’ interlanguage development. This article looks at the language performance of elementary learners of Polish as a foreign language with a view to diagnosing areas of difficulty at the initial stages of language instruction. It is a case study of five learners’ written production after a year of intensive language instruction in the controlled conditions of a classroom. The objective of the study presented here is: (1) to determine the types of error produced in a short translation task at different levels of language (morphosyntactic, lexical); (2) to observe manifestations of crosslinguistic influences between languages the subjects know (interlingual transfer) as well as those related to the language learnt itself (intralingual transfer). The small sample of texts produced does not allow for any generalized observations and conclusions, however, at the level of elementary competence in any foreign language, as other research shows, the amount of individual variation is not the most significant factor. Thus the incorrect forms produced may testify to some more universally error-prone areas of language. The value of this kind of analysis lies in this direct application to the teaching of Polish as a synthetic language. The study also demonstrates the fact that communicative teaching has a limited contribution to make in the case of this family of languages. It suggests that overt and explicit teaching of a synthetic language will give a sounder basis for further development of language competence in its communicative dimension.

References

Arndt, V.; Harvey, P.; Nuttall, J. 2000. Alive to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cenoz, J.; Jessner, U. (Eds.). 2000. English in Europe: The Acquisition of a Third Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

DeKeyser, R. 2005. What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of Issues. Language Learning. 55 (Supplement 1): 1-25.

Gabrys-Barker, D. 2005. Aspects of multilingual storage, processing and retrieval. Katowice: University of Silesia Press.

Kucharczyk, J. 1995. Zaczynam mówic po polsku. Lodz: Wing. [Polish explanatory text, translated by J. Hartzell].

Lasagabaster, D. 2000. Three languages and Three Linguistic Models in the Basque Educational System. In: J. Cenoz; U. Jessner (Eds.). English in Europe: The Acquisition of a Third Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 179-197.

Mczak- Wolhfeld, E. 2006. Angielsko-polskie kontakty j zykowe. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiello skiego.

Monk, B.; Burak, A. 1994. Russian speakers. In: M. Swan; B. Smith (Eds.). Learner English. A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 145-161.

Odlin, T. 1993. Language transfer. Crosslinguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (3.rd printing).

Thornbury, S. 1997. About Language. Tasks for teachers of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Lier, L. 1995. Introducing Language Awareness. London: Penguin English.

Ytsma, J. 2000. Trilingual Primary Education in Friesland. In: J. Cenoz; U. Jessner (Eds.). English in Europe: The Acquisition of a Third Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 222-235.

Published

2018-05-16