Foot gestures: description of a list

Authors

  • Isabel Galhano Rodrigues Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto; Centro de Linguística da Universidade do Porto

Abstract

Following a linguistic approach of gesture studies, this paper presents a case that bears witness to the robustness of gesture. It describes a listing procedure, recurrent in discourse organization, which consists in the production of a sequence of units characterised by syntactic, prosodic and gestual parallelism. In this example the speaker (a victim of Thalidomide) has no upper limbs, but he gesticulates with his feet. The analysis of the modalities involved in the listing activity will show that feet gestures can assume the functions performed by manual gestures. The example points out not only the tight link between gesture and speech, but also the embodiment of the listing activity, resulting from the necessity to index ideas or objects to the real world.

References

Alibali, M. 2014. Embodiment – the body and its role for cognition, emotion, and communication. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. H. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teendorf (Eds.). Body–language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1833-1840.

Auer, P.; Couper-Kuhlen, E. 1994. Rhythmus und Tempo konversationeller Alltagsprache. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 96, 78-106.

Boersma, P.;Weenink, D. 2008. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. [Computer Pro- gram] Version 6.0.37, retrieved 14 March 2018 from http://www.praat.org/

de Ruiter, J.P. 2007. Postcards of the mind: the relationship between speech, imagistic gesture and thought. Gesture. 7 (1), 21-38.

ELAN, the software annotation tool. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Open sourse software. https://tla.mpi.nl/ tools/tla-tools/elan/ (acedido a 5 de abril de 2018).

Enfield, N.J. 2011. Elements of Formulation. In: J. Streeck; C. Goodwin; C. LeBaron (Eds). Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 59-66.

Enfield, N.J.; Kita, S.;de Ruiter, J.P. 2007. Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics. 40, 1722–1741.

Galhano-Rodrigues, I. 2007. O corpo e a fala. Lisboa: FCG/FCT.

Galhano-Rodrigues, I. 2012. Vou buscar ali, ali acima! A multimodalidade da deixis no português europeu. Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto. 7, 129-164.

Galhano-Rodrigues, I. 2015. A tool at hand - gestures and rhythm in listing events: case studies of European and African Portuguese speakers. OSLa: Oslo Studies in Language. 7 (1), 253-281.

Galvão, E.Z. 2015. Gestures. In: F Pöchhacker (Ed.) Routledge encyclopedia of interpret- ing studies. London: Routledge, 552.

Goldin-Meadow, S. 2003. Hearing Gesture. How hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Goldin-Meadow, S. 2013. How our gestures help us learn? In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S.H. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teendorf (Eds.). Body–language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 792-803.

Goldin-Meadow, S. 2017. What the hands can tell us about language emergence. Psy- chonomic Bulletin and Review. 24 (1), 213–218. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1074-x.

Gumperz, J. 1992 Contextualization and understanding. In: A. Duranti A.; C. Goodwin (Eds.). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229-252.

Kendon, A. 2004.Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kendon, A. 2013. Exploring the utterance roles of visible bodily action: A personal ac- count. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teßendorf (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 7-28.

Kita, S.; Özyürek, A. 2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language. 48, 16–32.

Ladewig, S. 2014. Recurrent gestures. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; J.Bressem (Eds.) Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1558–1574.

Levinson, S.C.; Holler,J. 2014. The origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. DOI:10.1098/ rstb.2013.0302.

McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McNeill, D. & Duncan, S.D. (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. Mc- Neill (Ed.), Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141-161. Müller, C. 2013. Introduction. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill;

S. Teßendorf (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1-6.

Müller, C. 2004. Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? In: C. Müller; R. Posner (Eds.) The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. Proceedings of the Berlin conference, April 1998. Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag, 233- 256.

Müller, C; Cienki, A.; Fricke, E.; Ladewig, S.; McNeill, D.; Teßendorf, S. (Eds.) 2013. Body- Language - Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. (HSK 38.2). Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Müller, C.; Ladewig, S.; Cienki, A.; Fricke, E.; McNeill, D.; Bressem, J. (Eds.) 2014. Body - Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. (HSK 38.2). Vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Özyürek, A.; Kita, S. 1999. Expressing manner and path in English and Turkish: Differences in speech, gesture, and conceptualization. In: M. Hahn; S. C. Stoness (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. London: Erlbaum, 507-512.

Payrató, L.; Tessendorf, S. 2014. Pragmatic gestures. In: C.Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; J. Bressem (Eds.) Body – Language – Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Ber- lin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1531-1539.

Ramachandran, V.; Blakeslee, S. 1998. Phantoms in the Brain. New York: Quill.

Selting, M.; Auer, P.; Barden, B.; Bergman, J.; Couper-Kuhlen, E.; Günthner, S.; Meier, C.; Quasthoff, U.; Schlobinski, P.; Uhmann, S. 1998. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkrip- tion-ssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte. 173, 91-122.

Sloetjes, H.; Wittenburg, P.2008. Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).

Streeck, J. 2009. Gesturecraft. The manufacture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Streeck, J. 2013. Praxeology of gesture. In: C. Müller; A.Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teßendorf (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 674- 688.

Zlatev, J. 2013. Levels of embodiment and communication. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teßendorf (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 533-550.

Published

2019-06-03