AVALIAÇÃO DAS GARANTIAS LITERÁRIA E ACADÉMICA EM CLASSIFICAÇÕES BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
uma abordagem metodológica preliminar
Palavras-chave:
Garantia académica, Garantia literária, Organização do Conhecimento, Teoria da classificaçãoResumo
No que concerne ao estudo das garantias, tal como ao da representação da saúde e da doença mental, a Classificação Decimal Universal (CDU) surge descurada na literatura em Organização do Conhecimento. A investigação procura verificar em que medida a divisão de Psiquiatria da CDU se alicerça nas garantias literária e académica. A garantia literária, coadunada com as abordagens bibliométrica e terminológica à análise de domínio, é determinada por análise de coocorrência de palavras de títulos e resumos de artigos em revistas científicas de Psiquiatria. A garantia académica, em linha com a abordagem, à análise de domínio, de conhecimento de especialistas, é averiguada através de entrevistas com especialistas de Psiquiatria e análise hermenêutica das transcrições. A investigação resulta na formulação de modelos metodológicos para a avaliação das garantias literária e académica em sistemas de classificação do conhecimento, conduzindo a um conhecimento mais circunstanciado dos pressupostos teóricos da CDU.
Referências
ARIA, M.; CUCCURULLO, C. 2017 Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 11:4 (2017) 959-975.
BARITÉ, M. 2019 Towards a general conception of warrants: first notes. Knowledge Organization. 46:8 (2019) 647-655.
BARITÉ, M. 2018 Literary warrant. Knowledge Organization. 45:6 (2018) 517-536.
BARITÉ, M. 2016 Literary warrant revisited: theoretical and methodological approach. In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 14th, Rio de Janeiro, 2016 - Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society: Proceedings. Ed. by J. A. C. Guimarães, S. O. Milani & V. Dodebei. Rio de Janeiro: Ergon, 2016, p. 146-155.
BARITÉ, M. 2011 La Garantía literaria como instrumento de revisión de sistemas de organización del conocimiento: modelo y aplicación. [Online]. Granada, 2011. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/17583. Doctoral dissertation - University of Granada.
BARITÉ, M.; BROZIA, A. I.; RAUCH, M. 2022 Academic warrant and knowledge representation: consensus, dissension and expert opinion. In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 17th, Aalborg, 2022 - Knowledge organization across disciplines, domains, services and technologies: Proceedings. Ed. by M. Lykke et al. Aalborg: Ergon, 2022, p. 297-302.
BARITÉ, M. [et al.] 2010 Garantia literária: elementos para uma revisão crítica após um século. Transinformação. 22:2 (2010) 123-138.
BARTLEY, K. A.; BROOKS, J. J. 2023 Fusion of horizons: realizing a meaningful understanding in qualitative research. Qualitative Research. 23:4 (2023) 940-961.
BEGHTOL, C. 2017 Classification theory. In Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. Ed. J. D. McDonald, M. Levine-Clark. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017, vol. 2, p. 958-973.
BEGHTOL, C. 2002 A Proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems. Journal of Documentation. 58:5 (2002) 507-532.
BEGHTOL, C. 1995 Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: the case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46:1 (1995) p. 30-44.
BEGHTOL, C. 1994 The Classification of fiction: The development of a system based on theoretical principles. [S. l.]: The Scarecrow Press, 1994.
BEGHTOL, C. 1986 Semantic validity: concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems. Library Resources & Technical Services. 30:2 (1986) 109-125.
BERNARDINO, M. C. [et al.] 2017 Rural cultural goods: an experience report of the taxonomy construction in the context of the historical farms of São Paulo. In Knowledge Organization and cultural diversity. Ed. J. A. C. Guimarães & V. Dodebei. Recife: ISKO-Brazil; Federal University of Pernambuco, 2017, p. 363-374.
BERRIOS, G.; MARKOVÁ, I. S. 2019 The Epistemology of psychiatry. Estudos do Século XX. 19 (2019) 59-70.
BOELL, S. K.; CECEZ-KECMANOVIC, D. 2014 A Hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. (2014) 257-286.
BOGNER, A., MENZ, W. 2009 The Theory-generating expert interview: epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. In Interviewing experts. Ed. A. Bogner, B. Littig, W. Menz. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, p. 43-80.
BROUGHTON, V. 2020 Henry Evelyn Bliss. In ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization. Ed. Birger Hjørland, Claudio Gnoli. [Online]. [S. l.]: ISKO, 2020. Available at: https://www.isko.org/cyclo/bliss#col.
BROUGHTON, V. 2015 Essential classification. 2nd ed. [Online]. [UK]: Facet Publishing, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783302383.
BULLARD, J. 2017 Warrant as a means to study classification system design. Journal of Documentation. 73:1 (2017) 75-90.
BULLARD, J.; WATSON, B.; PURDOME, C. 2022 Misrepresentation in the surrogate: author critiques of “Indians of North America” subject headings. Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly. 60:6/7 (2022) 599-619.
CALLON, M.; COURTIAL, J. P.; LAVILLE, F. 1991 Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics. 22:1 (1991) 155-205.
CLARKE, R. I. 2015 Designing disciplinary identity: An analysis of the term “design” in Library and Information Science vocabulary. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 52:1 (2015) 1-4.
COBO, M. J. [et al.] 2011 An Approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics. 5:1 (2011) 146-166.
COOPER, R. 2017 Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM). Knowledge Organization. 44:8 (2017) 668-676.
COURBIÈRES, C. 2013 La Représentation documentaire du genre dans les classifications décimales. Hermès, La Revue. 66:2 (2013) 112-118.
DABNEY, D. 2007 The Universe of thinkable thoughts: Literary warrant and West’s Key Number System. Law Library Journal. 99:2 (2007) 229-247.
DAHLBERG, I. 1976 Classification theory, yesterday and today. Knowledge Organization. 3:2 (1976) 85-90.
DIAS, C. da C. 2015 A Análise de domínio, as comunidades discursivas, a garantia de literatura e outras garantias. Informação & Socieddae: Estudos. 25:2 (2015) 7-17.
DÖRINGER, S. 2021 The Problem-centred expert interview: Combining qualitative interviewing approaches for investigating implicit expert knowledge. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 24:3 (2021) 265-278.
FANDINO, M. 2008 UDC or DDC: a note about the suitable choice for the National Library of Liechtenstein. Extensions & Corrections to the UDC. 30 (2008) 45-47.
FRIMAN, M.; JANSSON, P.; SUOMINEN, V. 1995 Chaos or order? Aby Warburg’s Library of Cultural History and its classification. Knowledge Organization. 22:1 (1995) 23-29.
GNOLI, C.; SMIRAGLIA, R. P.; SZOSTAK, R. 2024 Phenomenon-based classification: an Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 75:3 (2024) 324-343.
HIDER, P. 2015 A Survey of the coverage and methodologies of schemas and vocabularies used to describe information resources. Knowledge Organization. 42:3 (2015) 154-163.
HIEBERT, J. T. 2009 Beyond mark and park: classification mapping as a collection development tool for psychiatry/psychology. Collection Management. 34:3 (2009) 182-193.
HJØRLAND, B. 2017a Classification. Knowledge Organization. 44:2 (2017) 97-128.
HJØRLAND, B. 2017b Domain analysis. Knowledge Organization. 44:6 (2017) 436-464.
HJØRLAND, B. 2002 Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches, traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation. 58:4 (2002) 422-462.
HOERMAN, H. L.; FURNISS, K. A. 2000 Turning practice into principles: a comparison of the IFLA principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) and the principles underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly. 29:1/2 (2000) 31-52.
KARMELITA, C. 2020 Advising adult learners during the transition to college. NACADA Journal. 40:1 (2020) 64-79.
KWAŚNIK, B. H. 2010 Semantic warrant: a pivotal concept for our field. Knowledge Organization. 37:2 (2010) 106-110.
LAW, J., WHITTAKER, J. 1992 Mapping acidification research: a test of the co-word method. Scientometrics. 23:3 (1992) 417-461.
LIMA, G. A. 2022 The Literary warrant in the representation of knowledge. Frontiers of knowledge representation. 2:2 (2022) 164-195.
LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, M. J.; LÓPEZ-PÉREZ, M. J. 2010 Epistemological dynamics in scientific domains and their influence in knowledge organization. In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 11th, Rome, 2010 - Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings… Ed. C. Gnoli, F. Mazzocchi. Rome: Ergon, 2010, p. 91-97.
MAI, J.-E. 2004 Classification in context: relativity, reality, and representation. Knowledge Organization. 31:1 (2004) 39-48.
MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, D.; BUDD, J. M. 2017 Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies. Journal of Documentation. 73:4 (2017) 700-715.
MERTES, K. 2018 Term selection. Indexer. 36:2 (2028) 48-55.
NYLUND, I. B. 2020 Using the concept of warrant in designing metadata for enterprise search. In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 16th, Aalborg, 2020 - Knowledge Organization at the interface: Proceedings… Ed. M. Lykke et al. Aalborg: Ergon, 2020, p. 328-337.
PATTERSON, M. E.; WILLIAMS, D. R. 2002 Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: Hermeneutic principles, methods, and case examples. Champaign, Illinois: Sagamore Publishing, 2002.
PETROVICH, E. 2021 Science mapping and science maps. Knowledge Organization. 48:7/8 (2021) 535-562.
RODRIGUEZ, R. D. 1984 Hulme’s concept of literary warrant. Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly. 5:1 (1984) 17-26.
RUSQUART, J. 2023 The Ontogeny of the subject as an approach to the ethical evaluation of classification systems: Mental health case study. Communication, technologies et développement, [Online]. 14 (2023) 1-23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/ctd.9779.
SACHS, M. Y.; SMIRAGLIA, R. P. 2004 From encyclopedism to domain-based ontology for knowledge management: the evolution of the Sachs Classification (SC). In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 8th, London, 2004 - Knowledge Organization and the global information society: Proceedings… Ed. I. C. McIlwaine. London: Ergon, 2004, p. 167-172.
SALDANHA, G. S.; SILVA, M. L. G. da 2017 Da Loucura e da arte nos limites de uma epistemologia da Organização do Conhecimento. In ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 18º, Marília, 2017 - Anais... [Online]. Marília, 2017. Available at: https://brapci.inf.br/v/104809.
SCHNEIDER, J. W. 2004 Verification of bibliometric methods’ applicability for thesaurus construction. Copenhagen, 2004. Doctoral dissertation - Royal School of Library and Information Science, Danmark.
SIMÕES, M. da G. de M. 2010 A Representação de etnia e a sua evolução na Classificação Decimal Universal. [Online]. Salamanca, 2010. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/20839. Doctoral dissertation - University of Salamanca.
SLAVIC, A. 2008 Use of the Universal Decimal Classification: A world-wide survey. Journal of Documentation. 64:2 (2008) 211-228.
SMIRAGLIA, R. 2015 Domain analysis for knowledge organization: Tools for ontology extraction. [Online]. [S. l.]: Elsevier, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100150-9.09996-X.
SUSEN, S. 2015 The ‘Postmodern Turn’ in the social sciences. [Online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318237.
SVENONIUS, E. 2009 The Intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2009.
TENNIS, J. T. 2003 Two axes of domains for domain analysis. Knowledge Organization. 30:3/4 (2003) 191-195.
THELLEFSEN, T. L.; THELLEFSEN, M. M. 2004 Pragmatic semiotics and knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization. 31:3 (2004) 177-187.
TRZMIELEWSKI, M. 2020 Representation of students’ mental health in information resources and in medical knowledge organization systems. In COLLOQUE INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINAIRE EN LIGNE, Toulouse, 2020 - La Santé mentale sur les campus universitaires face aux défis contemporains: de la discrimination à la COVID-19. [Online]. Toulouse, 2020. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-02981321v2.
TÜRKÖZER, H. B.; ÖNGÜR, D. 2020 A Projection for psychiatry in the post-COVID-19 era: potential trends, challenges, and directions. Molecular Psychiatry. 25:10 (Oct. 2020) 2.214-2.219.
UDC CONSORTIUM [20--] UDC fact sheet. [Online]. [20--]. Available at: https://udcc.org/index.php/site/page?view=factsheet
ULLAH, A.; KHUSRO, S.; ULLAH, I. 2017 Bibliographic classification in the digital age: current trends and future directions. Information Technology and Libraries. 36:3 (2017) 48-77.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Páginas a&b: arquivos e bibliotecas
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
