EVALUATING LITERARY AND SCHOLARLY WARRANTS IN BIBLIOGRAPHICAL CLASSIFICATIONS
a methodological endeavour
Palabras clave:
Scholarly warrant, Literary warrant, Knowledge organisation, Classification theoryResumen
Within knowledge organisation studies, the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) remains overlooked regarding the warrants upon which it is grounded, alongside its representation of mental health and mental illness. The research endeavours to determine the extent to which the schedule for psychiatry of the Universal Decimal Classification is based on literary warrant and scholarly warrant. Literary warrant, as an approach to domain analysis’ bibliometric and terminological studies, is assessed through term co-occurrence analysis of titles and abstracts from journal articles in psychiatry. Conversely, scholarly warrant, as an approach to domain analysis’ expert knowledge, is evaluated by theory-generating expert interviews with psychiatry specialists and hermeneutic analysis. The research leads to the formulation of methodological models for the evaluation of the literary warrant and scholarly warrant in knowledge classification systems, providing a more comprehensive understanding of Universal Decimal Classification’s theoretical foundations.
Citas
ARIA, M.; CUCCURULLO, C. 2017 Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 11:4 (2017) 959-975.
BARITÉ, M. 2019 Towards a general conception of warrants: first notes. Knowledge Organization. 46:8 (2019) 647-655.
BARITÉ, M. 2018 Literary warrant. Knowledge Organization. 45:6 (2018) 517-536.
BARITÉ, M. 2016 Literary warrant revisited: theoretical and methodological approach. In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 14th, Rio de Janeiro, 2016 - Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society: Proceedings. Ed. by J. A. C. Guimarães, S. O. Milani & V. Dodebei. Rio de Janeiro: Ergon, 2016, p. 146-155.
BARITÉ, M. 2011 La Garantía literaria como instrumento de revisión de sistemas de organización del conocimiento: modelo y aplicación. [Online]. Granada, 2011. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/17583. Doctoral dissertation - University of Granada.
BARITÉ, M.; BROZIA, A. I.; RAUCH, M. 2022 Academic warrant and knowledge representation: consensus, dissension and expert opinion. In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 17th, Aalborg, 2022 - Knowledge organization across disciplines, domains, services and technologies: Proceedings. Ed. by M. Lykke et al. Aalborg: Ergon, 2022, p. 297-302.
BARITÉ, M. [et al.] 2010 Garantia literária: elementos para uma revisão crítica após um século. Transinformação. 22:2 (2010) 123-138.
BARTLEY, K. A.; BROOKS, J. J. 2023 Fusion of horizons: realizing a meaningful understanding in qualitative research. Qualitative Research. 23:4 (2023) 940-961.
BEGHTOL, C. 2017 Classification theory. In Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. Ed. J. D. McDonald, M. Levine-Clark. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017, vol. 2, p. 958-973.
BEGHTOL, C. 2002 A Proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems. Journal of Documentation. 58:5 (2002) 507-532.
BEGHTOL, C. 1995 Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: the case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46:1 (1995) p. 30-44.
BEGHTOL, C. 1994 The Classification of fiction: The development of a system based on theoretical principles. [S. l.]: The Scarecrow Press, 1994.
BEGHTOL, C. 1986 Semantic validity: concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems. Library Resources & Technical Services. 30:2 (1986) 109-125.
BERNARDINO, M. C. [et al.] 2017 Rural cultural goods: an experience report of the taxonomy construction in the context of the historical farms of São Paulo. In Knowledge Organization and cultural diversity. Ed. J. A. C. Guimarães & V. Dodebei. Recife: ISKO-Brazil; Federal University of Pernambuco, 2017, p. 363-374.
BERRIOS, G.; MARKOVÁ, I. S. 2019 The Epistemology of psychiatry. Estudos do Século XX. 19 (2019) 59-70.
BOELL, S. K.; CECEZ-KECMANOVIC, D. 2014 A Hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. (2014) 257-286.
BOGNER, A., MENZ, W. 2009 The Theory-generating expert interview: epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. In Interviewing experts. Ed. A. Bogner, B. Littig, W. Menz. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, p. 43-80.
BROUGHTON, V. 2020 Henry Evelyn Bliss. In ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization. Ed. Birger Hjørland, Claudio Gnoli. [Online]. [S. l.]: ISKO, 2020. Available at: https://www.isko.org/cyclo/bliss#col.
BROUGHTON, V. 2015 Essential classification. 2nd ed. [Online]. [UK]: Facet Publishing, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783302383.
BULLARD, J. 2017 Warrant as a means to study classification system design. Journal of Documentation. 73:1 (2017) 75-90.
BULLARD, J.; WATSON, B.; PURDOME, C. 2022 Misrepresentation in the surrogate: author critiques of “Indians of North America” subject headings. Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly. 60:6/7 (2022) 599-619.
CALLON, M.; COURTIAL, J. P.; LAVILLE, F. 1991 Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics. 22:1 (1991) 155-205.
CLARKE, R. I. 2015 Designing disciplinary identity: An analysis of the term “design” in Library and Information Science vocabulary. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 52:1 (2015) 1-4.
COBO, M. J. [et al.] 2011 An Approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics. 5:1 (2011) 146-166.
COOPER, R. 2017 Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM). Knowledge Organization. 44:8 (2017) 668-676.
COURBIÈRES, C. 2013 La Représentation documentaire du genre dans les classifications décimales. Hermès, La Revue. 66:2 (2013) 112-118.
DABNEY, D. 2007 The Universe of thinkable thoughts: Literary warrant and West’s Key Number System. Law Library Journal. 99:2 (2007) 229-247.
DAHLBERG, I. 1976 Classification theory, yesterday and today. Knowledge Organization. 3:2 (1976) 85-90.
DIAS, C. da C. 2015 A Análise de domínio, as comunidades discursivas, a garantia de literatura e outras garantias. Informação & Socieddae: Estudos. 25:2 (2015) 7-17.
DÖRINGER, S. 2021 The Problem-centred expert interview: Combining qualitative interviewing approaches for investigating implicit expert knowledge. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 24:3 (2021) 265-278.
FANDINO, M. 2008 UDC or DDC: a note about the suitable choice for the National Library of Liechtenstein. Extensions & Corrections to the UDC. 30 (2008) 45-47.
FRIMAN, M.; JANSSON, P.; SUOMINEN, V. 1995 Chaos or order? Aby Warburg’s Library of Cultural History and its classification. Knowledge Organization. 22:1 (1995) 23-29.
GNOLI, C.; SMIRAGLIA, R. P.; SZOSTAK, R. 2024 Phenomenon-based classification: an Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 75:3 (2024) 324-343.
HIDER, P. 2015 A Survey of the coverage and methodologies of schemas and vocabularies used to describe information resources. Knowledge Organization. 42:3 (2015) 154-163.
HIEBERT, J. T. 2009 Beyond mark and park: classification mapping as a collection development tool for psychiatry/psychology. Collection Management. 34:3 (2009) 182-193.
HJØRLAND, B. 2017a Classification. Knowledge Organization. 44:2 (2017) 97-128.
HJØRLAND, B. 2017b Domain analysis. Knowledge Organization. 44:6 (2017) 436-464.
HJØRLAND, B. 2002 Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches, traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation. 58:4 (2002) 422-462.
HOERMAN, H. L.; FURNISS, K. A. 2000 Turning practice into principles: a comparison of the IFLA principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) and the principles underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly. 29:1/2 (2000) 31-52.
KARMELITA, C. 2020 Advising adult learners during the transition to college. NACADA Journal. 40:1 (2020) 64-79.
KWAŚNIK, B. H. 2010 Semantic warrant: a pivotal concept for our field. Knowledge Organization. 37:2 (2010) 106-110.
LAW, J., WHITTAKER, J. 1992 Mapping acidification research: a test of the co-word method. Scientometrics. 23:3 (1992) 417-461.
LIMA, G. A. 2022 The Literary warrant in the representation of knowledge. Frontiers of knowledge representation. 2:2 (2022) 164-195.
LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, M. J.; LÓPEZ-PÉREZ, M. J. 2010 Epistemological dynamics in scientific domains and their influence in knowledge organization. In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 11th, Rome, 2010 - Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings… Ed. C. Gnoli, F. Mazzocchi. Rome: Ergon, 2010, p. 91-97.
MAI, J.-E. 2004 Classification in context: relativity, reality, and representation. Knowledge Organization. 31:1 (2004) 39-48.
MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, D.; BUDD, J. M. 2017 Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies. Journal of Documentation. 73:4 (2017) 700-715.
MERTES, K. 2018 Term selection. Indexer. 36:2 (2028) 48-55.
NYLUND, I. B. 2020 Using the concept of warrant in designing metadata for enterprise search. In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 16th, Aalborg, 2020 - Knowledge Organization at the interface: Proceedings… Ed. M. Lykke et al. Aalborg: Ergon, 2020, p. 328-337.
PATTERSON, M. E.; WILLIAMS, D. R. 2002 Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: Hermeneutic principles, methods, and case examples. Champaign, Illinois: Sagamore Publishing, 2002.
PETROVICH, E. 2021 Science mapping and science maps. Knowledge Organization. 48:7/8 (2021) 535-562.
RODRIGUEZ, R. D. 1984 Hulme’s concept of literary warrant. Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly. 5:1 (1984) 17-26.
RUSQUART, J. 2023 The Ontogeny of the subject as an approach to the ethical evaluation of classification systems: Mental health case study. Communication, technologies et développement, [Online]. 14 (2023) 1-23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/ctd.9779.
SACHS, M. Y.; SMIRAGLIA, R. P. 2004 From encyclopedism to domain-based ontology for knowledge management: the evolution of the Sachs Classification (SC). In INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 8th, London, 2004 - Knowledge Organization and the global information society: Proceedings… Ed. I. C. McIlwaine. London: Ergon, 2004, p. 167-172.
SALDANHA, G. S.; SILVA, M. L. G. da 2017 Da Loucura e da arte nos limites de uma epistemologia da Organização do Conhecimento. In ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 18º, Marília, 2017 - Anais... [Online]. Marília, 2017. Available at: https://brapci.inf.br/v/104809.
SCHNEIDER, J. W. 2004 Verification of bibliometric methods’ applicability for thesaurus construction. Copenhagen, 2004. Doctoral dissertation - Royal School of Library and Information Science, Danmark.
SIMÕES, M. da G. de M. 2010 A Representação de etnia e a sua evolução na Classificação Decimal Universal. [Online]. Salamanca, 2010. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/20839. Doctoral dissertation - University of Salamanca.
SLAVIC, A. 2008 Use of the Universal Decimal Classification: A world-wide survey. Journal of Documentation. 64:2 (2008) 211-228.
SMIRAGLIA, R. 2015 Domain analysis for knowledge organization: Tools for ontology extraction. [Online]. [S. l.]: Elsevier, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100150-9.09996-X.
SUSEN, S. 2015 The ‘Postmodern Turn’ in the social sciences. [Online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318237.
SVENONIUS, E. 2009 The Intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2009.
TENNIS, J. T. 2003 Two axes of domains for domain analysis. Knowledge Organization. 30:3/4 (2003) 191-195.
THELLEFSEN, T. L.; THELLEFSEN, M. M. 2004 Pragmatic semiotics and knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization. 31:3 (2004) 177-187.
TRZMIELEWSKI, M. 2020 Representation of students’ mental health in information resources and in medical knowledge organization systems. In COLLOQUE INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINAIRE EN LIGNE, Toulouse, 2020 - La Santé mentale sur les campus universitaires face aux défis contemporains: de la discrimination à la COVID-19. [Online]. Toulouse, 2020. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-02981321v2.
TÜRKÖZER, H. B.; ÖNGÜR, D. 2020 A Projection for psychiatry in the post-COVID-19 era: potential trends, challenges, and directions. Molecular Psychiatry. 25:10 (Oct. 2020) 2.214-2.219.
UDC CONSORTIUM [20--] UDC fact sheet. [Online]. [20--]. Available at: https://udcc.org/index.php/site/page?view=factsheet
ULLAH, A.; KHUSRO, S.; ULLAH, I. 2017 Bibliographic classification in the digital age: current trends and future directions. Information Technology and Libraries. 36:3 (2017) 48-77.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Páginas a&b
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Se autoriza a los autores a suscribir contratos adicionales por separado para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (por ejemplo, publicación en un repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
