Offence-Presumptive Terms
A Troubling Category in Linguistic Offensiveness
Keywords:
offensive language, lexical neighbours, forensic lexis, dual-process reasoning, lexical inferencing, phonological similarity, niggardly, N-wordAbstract
This paper argues that there is a set of words, word senses and phrases that are not inherently offensive but that can lead the hearer to presume that they are offensive. The archetypal, though now somewhat problematic, case is the adjective niggardly (‘stingy’, ‘parsimonious’), but I also discuss two cases based on forensic casework: the metaphorical sense of the verb kneecap (bring to its knees); and the now aging catchphrase never mind the quality, feel the width (go for quantity over quality, used ironically). These offence-presumptive terms are a subcategory of Low-Occurrence Ordinary Terms (LOOTs). LOOTs are ordinary enough for the speaker to presume they will be understood and for the hearer to presume that they know or can infer the meaning, while at the same time infrequent enough not to be familiar to many hearers. Crucially, offense-presumptive LOOTs have lexical ‘neighbours’ in our mental lexicons that are either attested as, or are perceived to be, offensive. I argue that the presumption of offensiveness comes about because hearers apply autonomous intuitive reasoning to the unknown word, word sense or phrase. While in many cases of lexical inferencing, such intuitive reasoning can lead us to make a successful guess about the meaning of a word, in the case of offence-presumptive terms, the hearer is led astray. Moreover, in raising a claim of linguistic offence, claimants prime HR personnel to activate in their own minds an offensive frame for the term. I consider the implications of this novel category for forensic lexical analysis, the judgment of linguistic offence and the ethics of interpersonal communication.
References
Allan, K. and K. Burridge (2006) Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ayto, J. and I. Crofton (2011) Brewer’s Dictionary of Modern Phrase and Fable. Online: Chambers Harrap.
Baddeley, A. (2007) Working Memory, Thought and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Billig, M. (2013) Learning to Write Badly: How to Succeed in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bingham, T. (2011) The Rule of Law. London: Penguin.
Bond, Z.S. (1999) Slips of the Ear: Errors in the Perception of Casual Conversation. New York: Academic.
Bunce, A., L. Hashemi, C. Clark, C.-A. Myers, S. Stansfeld and S. McManus (2023) Prevalence and nature of workplace bullying and harassment and associations with mental health conditions in England: a cross-sectional probability sample survey. Lancet 402.
Cameron, D. (1995) Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
Coulthard, M. (2004) Author identification, idiolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Applied Linguistics 25(4): 431-447.
de Ruiter, J.P., H. Mitterer and N.J. Enfield (2006) Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language 83(3): 515-535.
Derbyshire, J. (2002) Niggling doubts. National Review Online. 17 September.
Dickerson, D. (1999) The last plantation: The ‘niggardly’ scandal should teach whites to watch their language and blacks to toughen up. Salon. 5 February.
Dinn, W.M. and C.L. Harris (2000) Neurocognitive function in antisocial personality disorder. Psychiatry Research 97: 173–190.
Dynel, M. (2018) Irony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
EHRC (2020) Sexual Harassment and Harassment at Work. Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Evans, J.S.B.T. (2012). Dual-process theories of deductive reasoning: Facts and fallacies. In K. J. Holyoak and R. G. Morrison, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 115-133.
Evans, J.S.B.T. (2018). Dual process theory: Perspectives and problems. In W. De Neys, ed. Dual Process Theory 2.0. London: Routledge: 137-155.
Evans, J.S.B.T. and D.E. Over (1996) Rationality and Reasoning. Hove, U.K: Psychology Press.
Evans, J.S.B.T. and K.E. Stanovich (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8(3): 223–241.
Federmeier, K.D. (2007) Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 44: 491-505.
Frederick, S. (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4): 25-42.
Gibbs, J. (2023) A modern version of restoration comedy? Double entendre, objectification, fearful men and rakes manqué in the television work of Benny Hill. Critical Studies in Television 19(4): 468-485.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007) Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. New York: Penguin Books.
Gladwell, M. (2005) Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking. New York (NY): Little, Brown and Co.
Grant, T. (2013) TXT 4N6: Method, consistency, and distinctiveness in the analysis of sms text messages. Journal of Law and Policy 21(2): 467–494.
Greenberg, J.H. and J.J. Jenkins (1964) Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word 20: 157–177.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan, eds. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press: 41-58.
Gumperz, J.J. (1993) Types of linguistic communities. Anthropological Linguistics 35(1/4): 130-142.
Haastrup, K. (1991) Lexical Inferencing Procedures or Talking about Words. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Hansard (2024) Hansard Online Archive.
Hansen, S.J., K.L. McMahon and G.I. de Zubicaray (2019) The neurobiology of taboo language processing: fMRI evidence during spoken word production. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 14(3): 271–279.
Happe, F.G.E. (1995) Understanding minds and metaphors: Insights from the study of figurative language in autism. Metaphor Symbolic Activity 10: 275–295.
Heffer, C. (2008) The Perceived Meaning in the UK of the words “Bambino Mio”. Bambino Mio Ltd and Cazitex. Claim No. HC07C01481
Heffer, C. (2020) All Bullshit and Lies? Insincerity, Irresponsibility and the Judgement of Untruthfulness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heffer, C. (In prep) Linguistic Offence: The RESPECT Framework for Evaluating Disputed Offensive Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopkins, N. (2002) Why nitty gritty has been ruled a no-no in the police lexicon. The Guardian. 15 May.
Hu, H.M. and H. Nassaji (2014) Lexical inferencing strategies: The case of successful versus less successful inferencers. System 45: 27-38.
Hudson, R. (1996) Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackendoff, R.S. (2002) Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jakubíček, M., A. Kilgarriff, V. Kovář, P. Rychlý and V. Suchomel (2013). The TenTen corpus family. 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL: 125-127.
Jay, T. and K. Janschewitz (2008) The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research 4: 267-288.
Jimmies (2024) That really rustled my jimmies. Know Your Meme. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/that-really-rustled-my-jimmies.
Juola, P. (2022). Google Books Ngrams. In L. A. Schintler and C. L. McNeely, eds. Encyclopedia of Big Data. Berlin: Springer.
Kahneman, D. (2013) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kennedy, R. (2002) Nigger: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word. New York: Pantheon Books.
Kies, D. (1985) Some stylistic features of business and technical writing: The functions of passive voice, nominalization, and agency. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 15(4): 299-308.
Kilgarriff, A., V. Baisa J. Bušta et al (2014) The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography ASIALEX 1: 7-36.
Kurtić, E., G.J. Brown and B. Wells (2013) Resources for turn competition in overlapping talk. Speech Communication 55(5): 721-743.
Lave, J. and E. Wenger (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, X. (1988) Effects of contextual cues on inferring and remembering meanings of new words. Applied Linguistics 9(4): 402-413.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987) Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25: 71–102.
McDonald, L. (2020) Your word against mine: the power of uptake. Synthese 199(1-2): 3505-3526.
McDonald, S.A. and R.C. Shillcock (2003) Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Science 14: 648–652.
Mikkelson, B. (2009) Were jimmies named after Jim Crow. Snopes. 25 Sept 2009.
Moore, M. (2021) BBC rejects race complaint about use of ‘nitty-gritty’. The Times. 23 January.
Norris, D. and J.M. McQueen (2008) Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review 115(2): 357–395.
OED (2025) Frequency. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/information/understanding-entries/frequency/?tl=true.
Oppenheimer, D.M. (2006) Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20(2): 139–156.
Pettit, M. (2016) Historical time in the age of big data: Cultural psychology, historical change, and the Google Books Ngram Viewer. History of Psychology 19(2): 141–153.
Pinker, S. (2007) The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. London: Penguin.
Poniewozick, J. (1999) The little N-word. Salon. 2 February.
Proverbio, A.M., S. Mariani, A. Zani and R. Adorni (2009) How are ‘Barack Obama’ and ‘president elect’ differentially stored in the brain? An ERP investigation on the processing of proper and common noun pairs. PLoS ONE 4(9): e7126.
Reber, A.S. (1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reddy, M.J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony, ed. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 284–310.
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff and G. Jefferson (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696-735.
Saussure, F.d. (1983[1916]) Course in General Linguistics. London: Duckworth.
Semenza, C. (2009) The neuropsychology of proper names. Mind and Language 24(4): 347-369.
Shannon, C.E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3): 379–423.
Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver (1964) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Chicago: University of Illinois.
Simpson, G.B. (1981) Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguityo. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 20: 130–136.
Sloman, S.A. (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119: 3-22.
Snow, T. (1999) Linguistic lynching over ‘niggardly’. Des Moines Register. 3 February.
Stojnić, U. and E. Lepore (2025) Inflammatory Language: Its Linguistics and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tanaka-Ishii, K. and H. Terada (2011) Word familiarity and frequency. Studia Linguistica 65(1): 96-116.
Vice, S. (2021). British-Jewish television drama: Jack Rosenthal to the present. In J. R. Malkin, E. Voigts and S. J. Ablett, eds. A Companion to British-Jewish Theatre since the 1950s. London: Bloomsbury: 187-200.
Vitevich, M.S. and P. Luce, A. (2016) Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics 2: 75-94.
Walton, D.N. (2014) Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
Wason, P.C. and J. Evans (1974) Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition 3(2): 141–154.
Wilson, N.L. (1959) Substances without substrata. Review of Metaphysics 12: 521–539.
Wilson, T.D. and J.W. Schooler (1991) Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60(2): 181–192.
Wray, A. (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wray, A. and J.J. Staczek (2005) One word or two? Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic interpretations of meaning in a civil court case. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 12(1-18).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chris Heffer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
