Professor: Who holds the copyright for AI-assisted and AI-generated contents?
Palavras-chave:
authorship, copyright, academic dishonesty, misconduct in science, lawsuits, infringement , artificial inteligenceResumo
Generative artificial intelligence has had a significant impact on intellectual property protection, mainly because model training is usually based on copyrighted content. This problem will deepen because, on the one hand, corporations with large training resources begin to sell contempt to AI companies, but also because authors whose copyrighted works are being used without permission react against this illegal theft. Parallel to this dilemma, a bigger one opens up: who is the copyright holder when artificial intelligence is an assistant in the creation of a work or when artificial intelligence has competently created a new work. The discussion of these issues is illustrated with the help of nine case studies, which are elaborated in more detail. Based on them, it becomes clear that works supported by artificial intelligence can become the author's works of persons whose creation was supported by AI, while competently autonomous works cannot be protected by any form of intellectual property protection.
Referências
Amazon (2024). Content Guidelines, https://kdp.amazon.com/en_US/help/topic/G200672390, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
AUTHOR (2023). Intentionally concealed.
Bagenal, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and scientific publishing: urgent questions, difficult answers. The Lancet, 403(10432), 1118-1120.
Chesterman, S. (2024). Good models borrow, great models steal: intellectual property rights and generative AI. Policy and Society, puae006.
Crews, K. D. (2020). Copyright law for librarians and educators: Creative strategies and practical solutions. American Library Association.
EJOI MK (2024). Odime po medalji, https://motika.mk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/05/ejoi.mp4, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
EU (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European parliament and of the Council, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32019L0790, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
EU (2024). , European Parliament Artificial Intelligence Act, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj l, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Ferrara, E. (2023). Fairness and bias in artificial intelligence: A brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Sci, 6(1), 3.
Frank, J., Herbert, F., Ricker, J., Schönherr, L., Eisenhofer, T., Fischer, A., ... & Holz, T. (2024). A representative study on human detection of artificially generated media across countries. In 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (pp. 55-73). IEEE.
Free Software Foundation (2022). What is copyleft, https://www.gnu.org/licenses/copyleft.en.html, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Gopalakrishna, G., Ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. PloS one, 17(2), e0263023.
Gray, A. (2024). ChatGPT" contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16887.
Hernández-Huerta, V. A. (2020). Disputed elections in presidential democracies: Contexts of electoral “blackmail”. The Journal of Politics, 82(1), 89-103.
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2018). The cultural industries (pp. 1-568). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Hitsuwari, J., Ueda, Y., Yun, W., & Nomura, M. (2023). Does human–AI collaboration lead to more creative art? Aesthetic evaluation of human-made and AI-generated haiku poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107502.
Hutson, J., & Schnellmann, A. (2023). The poetry of prompts: the collaborative role of generative artificial intelligence in the creation of poetry and the anxiety of machine influence. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: D, 23(1).
Informa PLC (2024). Press Release, https://www.informa.com/globalassets/documents/investor-relations/2024/informa-plc---market-update.pdf, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Jaszi, P. (2017). Toward a theory of copyright: the metamorphoses of “authorship”. In Intellectual Property Law and History (pp. 61-108). Routledge.
Johnston, A. (Ed.). (1953). Chapter 4. In: The legendary Mizners (pp. 66). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
Justia (2023). Andersen et al v. Stability AI Ltd. et al, https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2023cv00201/407208/67, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Köbis, N., & Mossink, L. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. Computers in human behavior, 114, 106553.
Liang, W., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., Lepp, H., Ji, W., & Zhao, X. Mapping the increasing use of LLMs in scientific papers. 2024.
Library of Congress (2023). Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05321/copyright-registration-guidance-works-containing-material-generated-by-artificial-intelligence, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Lunney Jr, G. S. (2001). The death of copyright: Digital technology, private copying, and the digital millennium copyright act. Virginia Law Review, 813-920.
Myers, C. S. (2018). Plagiarism and copyright: best practices for classroom education. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(1), 91-99.
Nicholls, A. R., Madigan, D. J., Duncan, L., Hallward, L., Lazuras, L., Bingham, K., & Fairs, L. R. (2020). Cheater, cheater, pumpkin eater: the dark triad, attitudes towards doping, and cheating behaviour among athletes. European journal of sport science, 20(8), 1124-1130.
Ochoa, T. T. (2002). Origins and meanings of the public domain. U. Dayton L. Rev., 28, 215.
OpenAI (2024). Europe Terms of Use, https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use/, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
OpenAI (2024). OpenAI and journalism, https://openai.com/index/openai-and-journalism/, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Panettieri, J. (2024). Generative AI Lawsuits Timeline: Legal Cases vs. OpenAI, Microsoft, Anthropic, Nvidia, Perplexity, Intel and More.
Pila, J. (2010). Copyright and its categories of original works. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), 229-254.
Resnikoff, P. (2024). UMG, WMG, Sony Music File Litigation Against AI Music Services Suno and Udio for Massive Copyright Infringement, https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2024/06/24/umg-wmg-sony-litigation-ai-music-suno-udio/, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Robertson, E. (2023). I tried the AI novel-writing tool everyone hates, and it’s better than I expected, https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/24/23732252/sudowrite-story-engine-ai-generated-cyberpunk-novella, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Schilit, H. M., & Perler, J. (2010). Financial Shenanigans Third Edition. McGraw-Hill.
Schoening, S. (2023). Machine Translation Explained: Types, Use Cases, and Best Practices, https://phrase.com/blog/posts/machine-translation/, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Spink, J., Moyer, D. C., Park, H., & Heinonen, J. A. (2013). Defining the types of counterfeiters, counterfeiting, and offender organizations. Crime Science, 2, 1-10.
Stanford University IT (2024). Dangers of Deepfake: What to Watch For, https://uit.stanford.edu/news/dangers-deepfake-what-watch, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Temple, K. (2003). Scandal nation: law and authorship in Britain, 1750-1832. Cornell University Press.
U.S. Department of Justice (2022). CRM 1500-1999, https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1852-copyright-infringement-penalties-17-usc-506a-and-18-usc-2319, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
US Copyright Office (1976). The Lifecycle of Copyright, https://www.copyright.gov/history/copyright-exhibit/lifecycle/, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
US Copyright Office (2020).The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, https://www.copyright.gov/dmca/, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Varian, H. R. (2005). Copying and copyright. Journal of economic perspectives, 19(2), 121-138.
Vieira, L. N., O’Hagan, M., & O’Sullivan, C. (2021). Understanding the societal impacts of machine translation: a critical review of the literature on medical and legal use cases. Information, Communication & Society, 24(11), 1515-1532.
Wach, K., Duong, C. D., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaitė, R., Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., ... & Ziemba, E. (2023). The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 7-30.
WIPO (1979), Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/textdetails/12214, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
WIPO (1996). Copyright, https://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Woody, K. E. (2020). The new insider trading. Ariz. St. LJ, 52, 594.
Young, L. (2024). What are the new and emerging trends in academic misconduct?, https://www.turnitin.com/blog/what-are-the-new-and-emerging-plagiarism-trends, Accessed on 1 November 2024.
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 21.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
