On Avoiding Anthropomorphic Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21747/21844585/tmid202602Palavras-chave:
biosemiotics, ecotranslationDownloads
Referências
Andrews, K., & Huss, B. (2014) ‘Anthropomorphism, anthropectomy, and the null hypothesis’, Biology & Philosophy, 29(5), 711-729.
Kennedy, J. S. (1992) The new anthropomorphism. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Merrell, F. (2003) Sensing corporeally: toward a posthuman understanding. University of Toronto Press.
Morgan, C. L. (1903) An introduction to comparative psychology (Vol. 27). W. Scott.
Nee, S. (2005) ‘The great chain of being’, Nature, 435(7041), 429-429.
Rendall, D., Owren, M. J., & Ryan, M. J. (2009) ‘What do animal signals mean?’, Animal Behaviour, 78(2), 233-240.
Sealey, A. (2021) ‘Response to Viewpoint article ‘‘Applied linguistics, language guidelines and ethical practices: The case for the use of ‘who’ with nonhuman animals’’’, Int J Appl Linguist., 31(2), 304-305.
Sealey, A. (2026) How we talk about animals, and why it matters: the power of discourse. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Sealey, A., & Oakley, L. (2013) ‘Anthropomorphic grammar? Some linguistic patterns in the wildlife documentary series Life’, Text and Talk, 33(3), 399–420.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Translation Matters

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
