‘Long live Harry and Meghan!’: an analysis of polite and aggressive argumentation strategies from online forums on celebrity-related news

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red8a7

Palavras-chave:

Argumentation Strategies, Politeness, Aggression, Online Forums, Discourse Analysis

Resumo

The Royal Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle took place in Windsor, on 19 May, 2018. Prior to the event, the bride’s nationality, profession, marital status and ethnicity were already news fodder for tabloids and society magazines. The couple’s high visibility made them targets for supportive comments, as well as hate speech and verbal aggression. At the time of the wedding, an array of contradictory online comments could be found in newspapers, often with extreme opinions being voiced. A sample of comments found on The Daily Telegraph on the 19th May will be looked into, focusing on different aspects of the ceremony. To explore the functioning of argumentation within such a contemporary arena for public discussion, it is the purpose of this paper to elaborate on the ways of expressing lines of reasoning displayed in these online comments, with argumentation strategies for agreement or disagreement about previously expressed points of view, either general in tone, or appearing as a thread in response to a specific commentator. Specific arguments are often put forward, to persuade others; disagreement is often established by poking fun at others’ contributions, whereas humour can be effective for face-saving purposes or for deflecting aggressive ‘ad hominem’ comments.

Biografia Autor

Elsa Simoes, Universidade Fernando Pessoa

Doutora em Linguística pela Lancaster University (2003).
Professora Associada na Universidade Fernando Pessoa (Portugal).
Membro Integrado do LabCom da Universidade da Beira Interior (Portugal).

Referências

Bousfield, D. & Locher, M.A. (Eds.) (2008). Impoliteness In Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin / New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals In Language Use. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

Blair, J. A. (2012). Argumentation as Rational Persuasion. Argumentation, 26, pp. 71-81.

Culpeper, J. (2013). Impoliteness: Questions and answers. In Jamet, D. & Jobert, M. (Eds.) Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness. Newcastle Upon Thyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Culpeper, J., Boufield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10-11), pp. 1545-1579.

Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Transactions.

Goody, E. N. (1978). ‘Introduction.’ In Goody, E. N. (Ed.) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-16.

Green, N. L. (2017). Argumentation Mining in Scientific Discourse. In Bex, F.; Grasso, F. & Green, N. L. (Eds) 18th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument. 16th July, London, UK, pp. 7-13.

Gruber, H. (2017). Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated dis-course. Discourse, Context & Media. 20, pp. 1-9.

Habernal, I & Gurevytch, I. (2016). Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 43 (1), pp.125-179.

Iyer, R. R.; Sara, K. & Li, Y. (2017). Detecting type of Persuasion: Is there structure in persuasion tactics? In Bex F.; Grasso, F. & Green, N. L. (Eds) 18th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument. 16th July, London, UK, pp. 54-64.

Justo, R.; Corcoran, T; Lukin, S. M.; Walker, M.. & Torres, M. I.. (2014). Extracting relevant know-ledge for the detection of sarcasm and nastiness in the social web. Knowledge-Based Systems, 69, pp. 124-133.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2010). L’impolitesse en interaction: Aperçus théoriques et étude de cas. Lexis 2, Special Issue ‘Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic (Im)politeness’, pp. 35-59.

Kim, J. (2018). Online incivility in comment boards: Partisanship matters - But what I think mat-ters more. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, pp. 405-412.

Kirschner, C.; Eckle-Kohler, J. & Gurevych, I. (2015). Linking the Thoughts: Analysis of Argumen-tation Structures in Scientific Publications. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pp. 1-11.

Lippi, M. & Torroni, P. (2016). Argumentation Mining: State of the Art and Emerging Trends, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 16 (2), article 10: 10.1, pp. 10.25.

van Laar, J. A. (2005). One-sided arguments. 6th OSSA Conference Archive, 37, pp. 207-306.

Downloads

Publicado

01-12-2019

Como Citar

Simoes, E. (2019). ‘Long live Harry and Meghan!’: an analysis of polite and aggressive argumentation strategies from online forums on celebrity-related news. Redis: Revista De Estudos Do Discurso, (8), 156–178. https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red8a7